The PeepalRooted in Wisdom.
Growing with Purpose
← All insightsPolicy & Law

India’s Carbon Market Framework: Reading the BEAMs Regulations

September 12, 2024

India’s Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) has been developing the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) as the operational backbone of the country’s domestic carbon market, with the Beureau’s Energy-saving and Additional Measures (BEAMs) methodology framework setting out how obligated entities and voluntary projects will generate and account for credits. For organisations operating in India, understanding this framework early is a strategic advantage, not a compliance afterthought.

Two tracks, one registry

The scheme is designed around two complementary tracks. The compliance track sets greenhouse gas intensity targets for obligated entities in energy-intensive sectors — building on the existing Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme’s infrastructure and extending it into a full emissions-intensity trading mechanism. The offset track allows non-obligated entities to register eligible projects, generate credits for verified reductions, and sell into the compliance market or to voluntary buyers.

Both tracks funnel into a single national registry, intended to give the market a unified source of truth on issuance, ownership, and retirement — addressing a fragmentation problem that has made voluntary carbon accounting difficult to audit in many other jurisdictions.

What obligated entities should be doing now

Sector-specific intensity targets are being phased in progressively, giving covered entities a runway to plan trajectory rather than face a compliance cliff. The organisations that will be best positioned are those that start baseline emissions accounting now — well before targets bind — so that any structural changes to production processes, fuel mix, or energy sourcing can be sequenced deliberately rather than reactively.

For non-obligated entities eyeing the offset track, methodology alignment is the critical early decision: projects developed against international standards (Verra, Gold Standard) will need to assess how readily their existing MRV (measurement, reporting, verification) infrastructure maps onto BEAMs’ domestic requirements, and where a parallel registration process may be necessary to access both markets.

The bigger picture

CCTS represents India’s attempt to build a carbon market that is credible enough to eventually interlink with international frameworks under Article 6, while still reflecting the country’s specific developmental priorities and sectoral realities. Getting the foundational rules right — baseline integrity, MRV rigour, registry transparency — will determine whether it succeeds where some earlier voluntary schemes struggled to scale.